Just Mercy by Bryan Stevenson April 2017

April 2017 selection - Just Mercy by Bryan Stevenson

The Fairfax Library Book Discussion Group will meet Thursday, April 20th at 7 p.m. in the meeting room of the Fairfax Library to discuss our April book, Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption by Bryan Stevenson.

Discussion questions and reviews are attached.

Here are some links for additional background and information:

Madison, Wisconsin’s Big Read put together this website with LOTS of info

Bryan Stevenson’s author website

Equal Justice Initiative was started by the author in Montgomery, AL

Equal Justice Works helps lawyers dedicated to a just society and equal justice

Prison Policy Initiative does research and advocacy around mass incarceration

Coming up, we have the following books to look forward to reading:

Thurs. May 11^th        Between the World and Me by Ta-Nehisi Coates

Thurs. June 8^th         Here Comes the Sun by Nicole Dennis-Bonn

Thanks for reading with us. I look forward to seeing you at the Fairfax Library.

Beth Bailey-Gates

Friends of the Fairfax Library

The Tsar of Love and Techno by Anthony Marra March 2017

March 2017 selection - The Tsar of Love and Techno by Anthony Marra

The Fairfax Library Book Discussion Group will meet Thursday, March 9th at 7 p.m. in the meeting room of the Fairfax Library to discuss our March book and the One Book/One Marin selection, The Tsar of Love and Techno by Anthony Marra.

Author interview and reviews are attached.

Here are some links for additional background and information:

One Book/One Marin COM website with LOTS of info and links

The author suggests watching Russian dash cam videos for a sense of the country

Coming up, we have the following books to look forward to reading:

Thurs. Apr.13^th          Just Mercy by Bryan Stevenson

Thurs. May 11^th        Between the World and Me by Ta-Nehisi Coates

Thurs. June 8^th         Here Comes the Sun by Nicole Dennis-Bonn

Thanks for reading with us. I look forward to seeing you at the Fairfax Library.

Beth Bailey-Gates

Friends of the Fairfax Library

The Sellout by Paul Beatty Feb. 2017

February 2017 selection - The Sellout by Paul Beatty

The Fairfax Library Book Discussion Group will meet Thursday, February 9th at 7 p.m. to discuss our February book, The Sellout by Paul Beatty.

Discussion questions are below.

Here are some links for additional background and information:

Short clip of the Little Rascals

Author interview with Rolling Stone Magazine

On Oct. 26, 1965, James Baldwin and William F. Buckley debated at the Cambridge Union (Cambridge University) debating society for and against the following motion: “The American Dream is at the Expense of the American Negro.”

Here is an interesting commentary on that debate which James Baldwin won by a landslide.

“It is a terrible thing for an entire people to surrender to the notion that one-ninth of its population is beneath them. Until the moment comes when we, the Americans, are able to accept the fact that my ancestors are both black and white, that on that continent we are trying to forge a new identity, that we need each other, that I am not a ward of America, I am not an object of missionary charity, I am one of the people who built the country--until this moment comes there is scarcely any hope for the American dream. If the people are denied participation in it, by their very presence they will wreck it. And if that happens it is a very grave moment for the West.” ~ James Baldwin

Coming up, we have the following book to look forward to reading:

Thurs. March. 9        The Tsar of Love and Techno by Anthony Marra

(One Book/One Marin selection)

Thanks for reading with us. I look forward to seeing you at the Fairfax Library.

Beth Bailey-Gates

Friends of the Fairfax Library

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

The Sellout by Paul Beatty

1. If you were a Supreme Court justice hearing the case of Me v. The United States of America, how would you rule? What does Hampton Fiske, the narrator’s attorney (“Don’t say shit! Don’t run! Don’t resist arrest!”), ultimately prove about America’s attempts to legislate life? 

2. Did you laugh or cry (or both) at the experiments run by F. K. Me, the narrator’s psychologist/social scientist dad? Does your experience of the world support his three-stage Theory of Quintessential Blackness, summarized in Fiske’s closing monologue? 

3. Does the concept of a ledger, designed to keep track of who owes a debt and who is entitled to receive a payment, accurately reflect the history of humanity in America? When Foy Cheshire calls the narrator a sellout on page 98, what is he saying was sold? Who were the buyers?

4. Marpessa calls the narrator Bonbon, a lightweight nickname that emerged when he was competing in a spelling bee at age 11 (page 124). Is she tougher than he is? Besides the bus, what else does she control? Would THE SELLOUT be very different if it were narrated by a black woman?

5. On page 138, after Marpessa dismantles the car industry’s fantasyland ads featuring affluent black men, Laura Jane tells Marpessa she’s “far too smart not to know that it isn’t race that’s the problem but class.” Is Laura Jane right?

6. How does the cover art (an illustration of a lawn jockey) summarize the narrator’s core conflict?

7. How did you react when the narrator created Dickens’s boundary lines (page 99), and Marpessa ejected strangers from the bus (page 134, taking her cue from George Wallace’s “Segregation Now” gubernatorial inauguration speech)?

8. Why does Hominy want to be the narrator’s slave? Even though he calls Bonbon “massa,” is Hominy ultimately his own master now that he has been emancipated by the entertainment industry?

9. Paul Beatty has said that he isn’t comfortable with labeling THE SELLOUT a satire; many of the novel’s cartoonish elements are steeped in realism (for example, Beatty’s inspiration for the Dickens charter was a list of actual deed restrictions from the Richland Farms section of Compton, which was zoned for agriculture). How does Beatty use tragicomedy to bring reality and absurdity into focus?

10. On page 274, the beautiful Supreme Court Justice from the Upper West Side asks her colleagues to consider what the words “separate,” “equal” and “black” really mean. How would you answer her? Do your answers explain the shooting of Bonbon’s father?

11. Paul Beatty is the first American to win the Man Booker Prize (which in 2014 was opened to any book written in English and published by a British publisher). Affirmed by a panel of British judges, does the novel deliver a universal message? Or is it exclusively a book about American strife?

12. Most canonical novels that explore race in America are either set in the South or in New York City. How does THE SELLOUT’s backdrop of Los Angeles change the conversation?

13. What’s so smart about the Dum Dum Donut club? When the narrator ponders “What exactly is our thing?” (page 288), what is he simultaneously asking about who has the power to create a cultural identity, who has the right to appropriate it, and who has the right to erase it?

14. From Beatty’s reinvention of Tennyson’s “The Charge of the Light Brigade” (“The Charge of the Light-Skinned Spade,” page 38) to hisThe Pejorative-Free Adventures (of Huckleberry Finn and Jim, page 95), which of the riffs in the book will stay in your mind the longest?

15. In the closing chapter, appropriately titled “Closure,” as Foy and the narrator debate whether the U.S. finally paid off its debts when “the black dude was inaugurated,” why isn’t Foy able to consider the plight of other non-white populations? Will it ever be possible for race to not matter in America?

16. In Paul Beatty’s previous novels and poetry, what is unique about the way he sees the world, and the words he uses to draw us in? 

17. Why is the prologue of the book written in a different style?

18. Were you ever uncomfortable with the language used by the author as you read the book? Why or why not?

The Diver's Clothes Lie Empty January 2017

January 2017 Book selection

The Fairfax Library Book Discussion Group will meet Thursday, January 12th at 7 p.m. to discuss our January book, The Diver’s Clothes Lie Empty by Vendela Vida.

Discussion questions are below.

Here are some links for additional background and information:

Punctuated equilibrium description

Ethics of surrogacy

NYTimes video of 36 hours in Casablanca

What is the nature of identity?

Audio of Vendela Vida interview with Michael Krasny

Coming up, we have the following books to look forward to reading:

Thurs. Feb. 9             The Sellout by Paul Beatty

Thus. Mar. 9              The Tsar of Love and Techno by Anthony Marra

(One Book/One Marin selection)

Thanks for reading with us. I look forward to seeing you at the Fairfax Library.

Beth Bailey-Gates

Friends of the Fairfax Library

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

The Diver’s Clothes Lie Empty by Vendela Vida

1.      The unnamed protagonist is a twin. In what ways is the twin metaphor used throughout the book? Does the fact that she is a fraternal twin make any difference?

2.      What effect does the author using the second person have on your reading of the novel?

3.      How does the novel relate a search for self?

4.      It may be hard to understand why the protagonist does the things she does in the novel such as taking someone else’s backpack and using that person’s credit card. Did your feelings about those actions change after learning about the birth of her niece and husband’s infidelity?

5.      On page 95, the red-haired bodyguard explains his interest in Darwin and “punctuated equilibrium” saying, “There are periods in evolution when species are in stasis because there’s no need for change. But then, usually because of a change in their environment, they have to adapt rapidly. That’s how new species come about.”  How does this information affect the protagonist?

6.      What is the nature of identity? Is it what people call you? What makes you “you”? Is it based on place – where you lived and live or the community in which you live or something else? How does acting play into identity?

7.      What affect does the location of the novel, Casablanca, have on your impressions of the story? Would the story have worked in other locations?

8.      The Diver’s Clothes Lie Empty is a novel about many things, including loss. What losses has the narrator endured?

9.      We recently read Outline by Rachel Cusk in which the main character remains nameless for most of the book and is recently divorced. Are there any other comparisons between the novels?

10.  Have you ever wanted to or tried to re-invent yourself?

The Diver’s Clothes Lying Empty on the Beach

You’re sitting here with us, but you’re also out walking

in a field at dawn. You are yourself

the animal we hunt when you come with us on the hunt.

You’re in your body like a plant is solid in the ground,

yet you’re the wind. You’re the diver’s clothes

lying empty on the beach. You’re the fish.

In the ocean are many bright strands

and many dark strands like veins that are seen

when a wing is lifted up.

Your hidden self is blood in those, those veins

that are lute strings that make ocean music,

not the sad edge of surf, but the sound of no shore.

Our Souls At Night December 2016

December 2016 Book Selection

The Fairfax Library Book Discussion Group will meet Thursday, December 8th at 7 p.m. in the meeting room of the Fairfax Library to discuss our December book Our Souls At Night by Kent Haruf.

  

Discussion questions are below.

Here are some links for additional background and information:

Interview with Kent Haruf’s widow

Brief author bio

Denver Post article/obituary regarding Haruf’s effect on Colorado

Coming up, we have the following books to look forward to reading and discussing:

Thurs. Jan. 12^th      The Diver’s Clothes Lie Empty by Vendela Vida

Thurs. Feb. 9^th        The Sellout by Paul Beatty

Thurs. Mar. 9^th          The Tsar of Love and Techno by Anthony Marra         

  

Thanks for reading with us. I look forward to seeing you at the Fairfax Library.

Beth Bailey-Gates

Friends of the Fairfax Library

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

Our Souls At Night by Kent Haruf

1. What does the title mean?

2. The novel begins with the word "and": "And then there was the day when Addie Moore made a call on Louis Waters." What do you imagine came before it?

3. Kent Haruf was known for using simple, spare language to create stories of great depth. How does the modest action in Our Souls at Night open onto larger insights about getting older?

4. It takes a considerable amount of courage for a woman of Addie’s generation to invite a man she hardly knows to sleep in her bed. What do you think propelled her to do it?

5. When Louis comes over for the first time, he knocks on her back door in the name of discretion. Addie says, "I made up my mind I’m not going to pay attention to what people think. I’ve done that too long—all my life. I’m not going to live that way anymore. The alley makes it seem we’re doing something wrong or something disgraceful, to be ashamed of" (8). How does her attitude influence Louis’s?

6. Both Louis and Addie have to contend with gossip about their relationship. Who handles it better?

7. What does Addie’s friendship with Ruth show us about Addie’s character?

8. Addie and Louis both had troubled marriages, but stayed married until their partners died. How does that sense of propriety, of loyalty, influence their relationship with each other?

9. In describing his affair, Louis says, "I think I regret hurting Tamara more than I do hurting my wife. I failed my spirit or something" (42). What does he mean by this?

10. Why did Addie refuse to move after Connie’s death? How did this decision color Gene’s reaction to his mother’s late-in-life love affair?

11. On page 52, Louis describes his relationship with Addie to his daughter, "It’s some kind of decision to be free. Even at our ages." Why does he feel freer with Addie than he does alone? How does his behavior become more uninhibited as the novel progresses?

12. How does Jamie’s arrival deepen the connection between Addie and Louis?

13. When Louis confesses that he wanted to be a poet, what effect does it have on Addie’s opinion of him? And on your opinion?

14. Addie and Louis both have regrets about the way they raised their children. How does that influence their relationship with Jamie?

15. Why did Addie buy new clothes for her trips to Denver that she never wears in Holt? What signal does it send to the reader?

16. On page 145, Addie mentions the Denver Center for the Performing Arts production of Benediction, based on the author’s own novel. Addie and Louis discuss the fact that it’s set in Holt, the fictional town in which they live. Why do you think Haruf slipped this into the story?

17. At the end of that conversation, Addie says, "Who would have thought at this time in our lives that we’d still have something like this. That it turns out we’re not finished with changes and excitements. And not all dried up in body and spirit" (147). What point is Haruf making?

18. Jamie’s arrival ultimately leads to grave consequences. What is Gene afraid of?

19. Several times during the novel, Addie is described as being brave, but she gives in to Gene’s demands. Is this a brave act? What is she protecting?

20. How would you describe the ending—as heartbreaking, hopeful, or something else?

21. In his final interview, Haruf discussed Our Souls at Night: "The idea for the book has been floating around in my mind for quite a while. Now that I know I have, you know—a limited time—it was important to me to try to make good use of that time. So I went out there every day. Typically, I have always had a story pretty well plotted out before I start writing. This time I knew generally where the story was going, but I didn’t know very many of the details. So as it happened, I went out every day trusting myself to be able to add to the story each day. I don’t want to get too fancy about it, but it was like something else was working to help me get this done. Call it a muse or spiritual guidance, I don’t know. All I know is that the trust I had in being able to write every day was helpful." How does reading this affect your understanding of the book?

Season of the Witch November 2016

November 2016 Book Selection

The Fairfax Library Book Discussion Group will meet Thursday, November 10th at 7 p.m. in the meeting room of the Fairfax Library to discuss our November book, Season of the Witch by David Talbot.

  

Discussion questions are below.

Here are some links for additional background and information:

David Talbot interview

Mark your calendar to visit the SF Mint in 2017 for SF History Days

Hunter’s Point Riot info

Lots of photos and essays about SF history in the ‘60s and ‘70’s

Coming up, we have the following books to look forward to reading and discussing:

Thurs. Dec. 10^th        Our Souls At Night by Kent Haruf

Thurs. Jan. 12^th      The Diver’s Clothes Lie Empty by Vendela Vida

Thurs. Feb. 9^th        The Sellout by Paul Beatty

Thurs. Mar. 9^th          The Tsar of Love and Techno by Anthony Marra         

  

Thanks for reading with us. I look forward to seeing you at the Fairfax Library.

Beth Bailey-Gates

Friends of the Fairfax Library

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

Season of the Witch by David Talbot

1. Season of the Witch covers some dark moments in San Francisco history. What factors do you think led to this confluence of largely unprecedented events within a relatively short period of time? Could it happen again?

2. Was it the leadership of then Mayor Dianne Feinstein, the 49ers winning the Super Bowl, or varied factors that led to a more calm and focused city?

3. San Francisco, unlike New York City, never again elected a Republican public official following the times of Season of the Witch. Why did this happen, and is this likely to always be the case?

4. Season of the Witch opens and closes with stories about the Hallinans, reflecting both the old Irish American power structure within the city, as well as the often fiery nature of SF politics. How has that changed over time?

5. In this year’s election, San Francisco voters were faced with some deeply contentious and acrimonious issues, with many of the hot button topics related to growth and construction, economic disparity, short term rentals and more. Were these issues predictable based on past history? 6. While Season of the Witch is obviously non-fiction, if such tales were offered as a fiction novel, do you think it would have been believed?

6.  Were you shocked or surprised by any of the stories related in the book?

7. Season of the Witch covers some rollicking times and harrowing times in San Francisco history. Which do you think is more descriptive of San Francisco today?

8. Events described in the book create some very effective and compassionate health care centers in San Francisco – from the Haight Street Clinic to San Francisco General’s Ward 5B. Were those “only in San Francisco” results?

Inherent Vice October 2016

October 2016 Book Selection

The Fairfax Library Book Discussion Group will meet Thursday, October 13th at 7 p.m. in the meeting room of the Fairfax Library to discuss our October book Inherent Vice by Thomas Pynchon.

Discussion questions prepared by NoveList are below.

Here are some links for additional background and information:

Thomas Pynchon fiercely protects his privacy but here is a brief bio and some random facts compiled by students at Pomona University

Wiki page for Inherent Vice with page by page notes, articles and more

Rolling Stone article: “Pynchon for Beginners”

Coming up, we have the following books to look forward to reading and discussing:

Thurs. Nov. 10^th        Season of the Witch by David Talbot

Thurs. Dec. 8^th          Our Souls at Night by Kent Haruf

  

Thanks for reading with us. I look forward to seeing you at the Fairfax Library.

Beth Bailey-Gates

NoveList Discussion Questions

Inherent Vice by Thomas Pynchon

What is Doc's relationship with drugs and how does it shape his character?
In the noir tradition of "private eyes," Doc fuels his work with substance abuse; his intoxicant of choice is marijuana, rather than liquor, which he consumes with the casual assurance of an everyday user. His perceptions and theories are often framed by the amount he's had, either assuring us that "he hadn't been smoking much" when he sees a mysterious, lovely orange light play across Shasta's face (p. 5); or, indirectly conceding he's become too stoned to function: "[T]he phone rang again, and he had one of those brief lapses where you forget how to pick up the receiver" (p. 35). His aptitude seems sharpest when he hasn't been overindulging, but this fact rarely seems to factor in his consumption.
For Doc, smoking pot is an emblematic lifestyle choice, not just a chemical crutch. It separates him from "gentlemen of the straight world persuasion" (p.4), like his counterpart in the police force, Detective Christian "Bigfoot" Bjornsen. Doc's neighborhood reflects his chosen identity, too: on Gordita Beach, "weeknights . . . weren't too different from weekends" (p.4).
Pot smoking suspends Doc in a state of permanent immaturity. It is strongly hinted that this is why Shasta split, and she surveys with distaste "everything that hadn't changed" in his habits, represented by his décor: " [an] authentic English Pub Dartboard up on the wagon wheel and the whorehouse swag lamp with the purple psychedelic bulb. . . the collection of model hot rods made entirely of Coors cans…the velvet painting and so forth" (p. 4). His immaturity even bleeds into stupidity, for example when he defensively compares himself to Sherlock Holmes (who used cocaine in the original stories), without realizing he's a fictional character: "No, he's real. He lives at this real address in London. Well, maybe not anymore, it was years ago, he has to be dead by now" (p.96).
Doc's drug use makes him an occasionally likeable but often unreliable narrator, who forms paranoid connections between the novel's numerous loosely tangled plots. Many prove to be dead ends, or red herrings, as with the initial case Shasta dispatches him on. There is a tissue that stitches them all together, but as with most noir novels the actual plot matters less than the atmosphere it evokes. Doc's drug amplifies amplify the sense of wacky paranoia that pervades the novel. When stoned, he goes down strange rabbit holes of cause and effect -- not unlike those that a reader may concoct while trying to unravel a complex noir plot.

What does Coy Harlington's character reveal about Doc?
Doc considers himself a rogue outside the "the straight world," living apart and even above the corrupt morass of betrayal and greed that he sees in the corporate and law enforcement communities. Even when the plots begin to get seriously scary, and bodies start piling up, Doc is unwilling to involve the police. "I wish….just once I could trust them," he sighs. "But it's like the force of gravity, they never pull in any but the one direction" (p. 194).
Coy Harlington is also part of the subculture, an inveterate drug user and a surf rocker, who becomes an overt tool of the forces Doc despises. Coy "works mostly for the Red Squad and the…Public Disorder Intelligence Division," (p.122) infiltrating subversive, would-be revolutionary groups and delivering their members into the hands of a shadowy right-wing vigilante organization with ties to powerful people and elements within the LAPD. The job gave his aimless life direction, and financial security, motivations not dissimilar from Doc's reasons for becoming a private eye. But Coy soured on the mission (which required him to fake his own death and separate from his family), in large part because many of the people he seems to be setting up "were looking at deep possibilities including real death" (p.302).
Coy's position can be seen as a more dramatic version of Doc's own: "Far as I see, you and Coy, you're peas in a pod," says Shasta. "Both of you, cops who never wanted to be cops. Rather be surfing or smoking or fucking or anything but what you're doing. You guys must've thought you'd be chasing criminals, and instead you're both working for them" (p. 312-314). This is an exaggerated claim on her part -- it is not clear that Doc is really working for anyone at this point in the novel -- but it is clear that she has struck a nerve. He fears becoming like Coy, a tool for oppressive forces that are beyond his ken and will gleefully manipulate his rebellious nature for their own ends.
Because Doc sees himself in Coy, the latter's redemption and freedom become a primary motivation in the final chapters of the novel. After it is revealed that Shasta is fine, and the Golden Fang conspiracy far too large for Doc to successfully tangle with, it is Coy's fate that the private eye devotes himself to. When Doc has defeated the small time bad guys and has the leverage to negotiate with their bosses, he does not ask anything for himself or Shasta. Instead he asks that Coy be released from his bondage to the right wing vigilantes (who in turn are being run by the Golden Fang, who are really a cabal of exceedingly wealthy businessmen).

What is the novel's central conflict?
Because several of Doc's cases aren't remotely about what he thinks they are, the novel raises interesting choices about what its central conflict -- or point -- may be. At first, tension between hippies and law enforcement -- epitomized by Doc's wary rivalry with the cop, "Bigfoot" Bjornsen -- seems very important. Early in the novel, Doc slurs Bjornsen as "the old hippie-hating mad dog himself…after a busy day of civil-rights violations" (p.9).
But these personal tensions are lessened as the story unfolds and the violent, large-scale nature of the Golden Fang operation is revealed. Behind almost every character looms the immensity of the Golden Fang: an elite conspiracy of epic proportions, driven by a one-sided class war that the 1960's hopeful dream of change (epitomized by 1960s hippies like Doc) has not dislodged. Crocker Fenway explains to Doc that the Golden Fang is, was, and will be, LA's ultimate power: "It's about being in place, we're in place. We've been in place forever. Look around, real estate, water rights, oil, cheap labor -- all of that's ours. It's always been ours….We will never run out of you people. The supply is inexhaustible" (p.346). By "you people," Crocker doesn't just mean hippies like Doc -- but everyone who isn't part of the wealthy, powerful elite. Coy expresses a similar realization after figuring out that his right-wing vigilante masters are also just tools of those with still more power, who "feel entitled to fuck with the lives of all who weren't as good or bright as they were, which meant everybody" (p.301).  
The terrifying reality of entrenched elitism -- and the violence it lives on -- is Doc's real nemesis, and he cannot grapple with it. Doc is set up to kill the Golden Fang henchmen, Puck and Adrian, to avenge the murder of Bjornsen's partner by the Golden Fang years earlier; otherwise, Doc would never have dreamed of taking on such a huge organization. Once Bjornsen gives him the Golden Fang heroin as a "reward," Doc is all the more cognizant of how dangerous the game has become -- and he wants out. Although Doc realizes he has only made a dent in their organization, he exchange the heroin to secure Coy's release from his obligations to the Golden Fang. As a counterpoint, against the novel's message about the massive nature of corrupt elitism, Coy affirms that the others -- those outside the elite -- also have staying power: "We've been laid siege to by far worse, and we're still here" (p.347).

What does Mickey Wolfmann's story arc tell us about the larger message of Inherent Vice?
The disappearance of Mickey Wolfmann is presented to us in the opening of Inherent Vice as the central mystery for Doc to investigate. He is meant to be a thoroughly disreputable capitalist, "biggest of the big, construction, savings and loans, untaxed billions stashed under an Alp someplace, technically Jewish but wants to be a Nazi" (p.7). He is a rapacious real estate developer, accompanied by a bodyguard of ex-cons who are members of the Aryan Brotherhood.
But Wolfmann -- the "bad boy capitalist" -- is reformed by his encounters with Shasta, and his induction into counterculture, which convinced him of the evil of his own ways. One of his bodyguards tells Doc that he had begun to consider a big change: "All the money he ever made -- he was working on a way to just give it back…Wouldn't be the first rich guy on a guilt trip lately" (p.150). Wolfmann becomes caught up in the 1960s utopian dream: "I feel as if I've awakened from a dream of a crime for which I can never atone, an act I can never go back and choose not to commit. I can't believe I spent my whole life making people pay for shelter, when it ought to've been free" (p.244).
But even his vast wealth isn't enough to withstand the powerful societal forces that want to maintain the status quo, in this case the Golden Fang and the FBI. As one federal agent derisively explains it to Doc, "Suddenly [Wolfmann] decides to change his life and give away millions to an assortment of degenerates -- Negroes, longhairs, drifters" (p. 244) -- and those in power (the Gold Fang as well as the FBI) simply can’t let such a valuable asset go. The only time Doc sees Wolfmann, he is being escorted by a small army of FBI agents through a Las Vegas hotel. Wolfmann has reverted to his bad old ways, and his utopian affordable housing project has been abandoned; there is "no more acid-head philanthropist," because "They did something to him" (emphasis added, p. 252).
Wolfmann's arc is symbolic of Inherent Vice's central premise. The 1960s ideal of peaceful revolution is inevitably undercut by the frailties and corruptions endemic to any human endeavor. Wolfmann becomes aware of the crimes for which he can never atone, the flaws at the core of his being, but still cannot overcome them. Inherent Viceseems to imply that such obstacles are insurmountable. Hence the name of the novel itself: "Built into the act of return finally was this glittering mosaic of doubt. Something like what Sauncho's colleagues in marine insurance liked to call inherent vice," which Doc is told means "what you can't avoid" (p.351).

What forces does Inherent Vice blame for the deterioration of 1960s idealism?
Inherent Vice is set in 1970, in the wake of the Manson murders and deteriorating 1960s counterculture. Paranoia abounds and the idealism and free-wheeling fun that Doc and his cohort hoped would last forever seems to have evaporated. Contemplating Mickey Wolfmann's abandonment of utopian idealism, Doc feels "caught in a low-level bummer" because "the Psychedelic Sixties, this little parenthesis of light, might close after all, and all be lost, taken back into darkness" (page 254). Shaken, he considers the possibility that behind every "concert, peace rally, love-in, be-in, and freak-in. . . those dark crews had been busy all along, reclaiming the music, the resistance to power," and every other thing they could, "for the ancient forces of greed and fear" (p.129-130).
But these authoritarian forces are not the sole source of the doom of the 1960s revolution. The novel also implies that the roots of its decay lay within a type of inward-looking, drug-hazed, self-obsessed brand of 1960s radicalism that is, ultimately, unproductive. Doc's own lifestyle might be considered representative of the issue: when everyone just chases the next high or good time, there is focused effort toward setting and achieving higher goals. The urge to "do your own thing" becomes isolating, rather than building community.
This inherent vice of the 1960s generation is typified by the long row of hippies Doc observes engrossed at an upscale retail music shop, each wearing headphones and seeming alone in a crowd. Unlike the "outdoor concerts where thousands of people congregated to listen to music for free, and where it all got sort of blended together into a single public self, because everybody was having the same experience," Doc sees that here they each listen separately, in "confinement and mutual silence." He is further confused to think that "some of them later at the register would actually be spending money to hear rock 'n' roll" (p.176). Doc thinks they have become complicit in the commoditization of the counterculture, sacrificing the greater cause for their individual experience.
The Golden Fang aren't winning merely because they have the power, but because they are able to use their would-be opponents' weaknesses to subvert the cause. They are better able to take advantage of humanity's inherent vice, original sin, than are those who share Doc's vague ideas of free love, drugs, and freedom.