Thursday, December 6, 2012

The Sense of An Ending

December 2012 Book Selection

The Fairfax Library Book Discussion Group will meet Thursday, December 13th at 7 p.m. in the meeting room of the Fairfax Library to discuss our December book: The Sense of An Ending by Julian Barnes.

Discussion questions are below.

Here are some links for additional background and information:


NY Times Obituary for literary critic Frank Kermode, author of The Sense of An Ending

Some videos of the Severn Bore

The Wobbly Bridge in London (aka the Millenium Bridge)

An interesting analysis of the “mathematical” equation in Adrian’s diary

Wikipedia investigation into the meaning of “peripeteia



Coming up, we have the following titles to look forward to reading:


Thurs. January 10    One Amazing Thing by Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni
Tues. February 12    The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet by David Mitchell
Tues. March 12         Train Dreams by Denis Johnson


Thanks for reading with us. I look forward to seeing you at the Fairfax Library.

Beth Bailey-Gates
Friends of the Fairfax Library



Discussion Questions
The Sense of an Ending by Julian Barnes

1. What does the title mean to you?

2. The novel opens with a handful of water-related images. What is the significance of each? How does Barnes use water as a metaphor?

3. The phrase “Eros and Thanatos,” or sex and death, comes up repeatedly in the novel. What did you take it to mean?

4. At school, Adrian says, “we need to know the history of the historian in order to understand the version that is being put in front of us” (p. 13). How does this apply to Tony’s narration?

5. Did Tony love Veronica? How did his weekend with her family change their relationship?

6. When Mrs. Ford told Tony, “Don’t let Veronica get away with too much” (p. 31), what did she mean? Why was this one sentence so important?

7. Veronica accuses Tony of being cowardly, while Tony considers himself peaceable. Whose assessment is more accurate?

8. What is the metaphor of the Severn Bore? Why does Tony’s recollection of Veronica’s presence change?

9. Why did Tony warn Adrian that Veronica “had suffered damage a long way back?” (p. 46). What made him suspect such a thing? Do you think he truly believed it?

10. In addition to Adrian’s earlier statement about history, Barnes offers other theories: Adrian also says, “History is that certainty produced at the point where the imperfections of memory meet the inadequacies of documentation” (p. 18), and Tony says, “History isn’t the lies of the victors . . .It’s more the memories of the survivors, most of whom are neither victorious nor defeated” (p. 61). Which of these competing notions do you think is most accurate? Which did Tony come to believe?

11. Discuss the character Margaret. What role does she play in Tony’s story?

12. Why does Mrs. Ford make her bequest to Tony, after so many years? And why does Veronica characterize the £500 as “blood money”?

13. After rereading the letter he sent to Adrian and Veronica, Tony claims to feel remorse. Do you believe him? What do his subsequent actions tell us?

14. When Veronica refuses to turn over the diary to Tony, why doesn’t he give up? Why does he continue to needle her for it?

15. What is Tony’s opinion of himself? Of Adrian? How do both opinions change by the end of the novel?

16. How does the revelation in the final pages change your understanding of Veronica’s actions?

17. Discuss the closing lines of the novel: “There is accumulation. There is responsibility. And beyond these, there is unrest. There is great unrest” (p. 163).
18. Would you describe Tony Webster as an "unreliable yet sincere narrator"? What do you think of Tony Webster? Is your impression at odds with what Tony Webster thinks of Tony Webster? Do you know anyone who’s like him? Does he remind you of you? When did it occur to you that Tony is not a trustworthy witness to his own life? That you may know more about him than he does? How does Barnes achieve this effect?
19. To what extent do you think Julian Barnes uses “peripeteia,” the unexpected twist in plot, to encourage the reader to adjust their expectations?

20. The Sense of an Ending is a novel about the imperfections of memory. What insight does it give the reader into ageing and memory?

21. Is the ending unforeseen, does it leave you with a sense of unease?

22. There are several references in the book to Ted Hughes - the poet who famously destroyed sections of the diaries of his ex-wife Sylvia Plath after her suicide (as Veronica destroys Adrian's diary). The world was furious at Hughes; they deserved clear answers, they insisted, and believed that the missing pages of the diaries would cast a crucial light onto the final state of mind of their beloved literary genius. But Plath and Hughes's children deserved protection, Hughes argued, and that need was paramount to history's need for clear answers - or, more cynically, to its simple curiosity to "know what happened." They deserved protection from the violence of their mother's final state of mind, Hughes argued. Is Tony being grossly insensitive by demanding to know "the truth" when a greater reality is at stake: the feelings of Veronica, her mother Susan, and Adrian Jr, who were far more affected by Adrian's life than he ever was?


Characters. What about Veronica (called “Mary” like the Madonna?), Adrian, Margaret and Sarah? (Sarah as in Old Testament Sarah who gave birth in her old age?) Do you agree with Tony’s assessment of them? This is a narrator who has edited his life so he can live with himself. What has he left out? Clearly his feelings about Veronica were more complex than he’s let on. What do you think their relationship was really like?
 Images. The novel opens with them. We can’t get wrists out of our minds: the watch worn facing inwards, Veronica wanking, Adrian’s suicide. And then semen sluicing down the drain, contrasting with the upstream tidal wave. The Thames and the bloody bathwater. What image or scene in the novel has stayed with you? Did Tony forget or did he fail to mention something that happened while they were watching the Severn Bore?

Style. Tony Webster is your classic unreliable narrator: his memory is faulty, his credibility wonky. (Julian Barnes has cited the unreliable narrator classic, The Good Soldier by Ford Madox Ford. Read it, it’s harrowing. So what IS a reliable narrator? Isn’t anything first-person dubious?)

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Lost Kingdom: Hawaii's Last Queen, the Sugar Kings and America's First Imperial Adventure - November 2012

November 2012 Book Selection

Special Author Event Thursday Evening

Join us to discuss our November book choice,
Lost Kingdom: Hawaii’s Last Queen, the Sugar Kings and America’s First Imperial Adventure
with the author, Julia Flynn Siler


The Fairfax Library Book Discussion Group will meet Thursday, November 8th  at 7 p.m. in the meeting room of the Fairfax Library to discuss our November book: Lost Kingdom: Hawaii’s Last Queen, the Sugar Kings and America’s First Imperial Adventure by Julia Flynn Siler.

Discussion questions are below.

Here are some links for additional background and information:


The author’s blog – with interesting notes about her book, Lost Kingdom

NY Times Article: Mark Twain’s Hawaii


Two short excerpts from documentaries, Hawaii’s Last Queen andNation Within




Coming up, we have the following titles to look forward to reading:


December 13              The Sense of an Ending by Julian Barnes
January 10                  One Amazing Thing by Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni
February 14                 The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet by David Mitchell



Thanks for reading with us. I look forward to seeing you at the Fairfax Library.

Beth Bailey-Gates
Friends of the Fairfax Library




DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
Lost Kingdom: Hawaii’s Last Queen by Julia Flynn Siler

1.      Whose story is Lost Kingdom and who should be telling it? Do you think Julia Flynn Siler, a haole or white foreigner to the islands, does a good job of showing all sides of this story about nineteenth century Hawaii? Do you think it is an important story?
2.      Is there a hero/heroine or villain/villainess in this story?
3.      How do you feel about Lili'u? Could she have done anything to alter the course of historical events? Should she have? Do you consider her a tragic figure?
4.      Was King David Kalakaua a good sovereign for Hawaii? How responsible was he for the course of events?
5.      How do you feel about the way the United States handled the annexation of Hawaii? Grover Cleveland claimed "Hawaii is ours...as I contemplate the means used to complete the outrage, I am ashamed of the whole affair." Do you agree/ disagree with him?
6.      How did the Hawaiians handled the annexation of Hawaii? Did you get a good sense from the book as to how and why they behaved as they did?
7.      There have been strong ties between San Francisco and Hawaii over the last 150 years, but the author states in an interview, “Many mainlanders have a very tenuous grasp of Hawaiian history.” Were you familiar with this history of Hawaii before reading the book?
8.      How did Claus Spreckels affect the history of Hawaii? What about Sanford Dole? Are there other characters in the book that you feel played a pivotal role and you'd like to know more about them?
9.      What surprised you about the original missionaries, and how do you feel about their descendents? Was everyone generally well-intentioned, or was self-interest paramount?
10.  The title of this book calls the annexation of Hawaii America’s First Imperial Adventure. Do you agree? Some consider that the United States always had expansionist tendencies, always looking to the west for expansion. Consider the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, Texas annexation in 1845, the purchase of Alaska in 1867 among other acquisitions.  Was Hawaii an inevitable acquisition?
11.  What is the relevance of this history for us today?
12.  Is there any significance in the fact that President Obama was born in Hawaii?
13.  Can you imagine an alternate history for Hawaii and the monarchy? Where would Hawaii be today if the US hadn't annexed it? Where would the US be today without Hawaii?
14.  Do you think this particular history of Hawaii could be better told as 'historical fiction'?


Thursday, October 11, 2012

The Forgery of Venus October 2012


The Fairfax Library Book Discussion Group will meet this Thursday, October 11th  at 7 p.m. in the meeting room of the Fairfax Library to discuss our October book: The Forgery of Venus by Michael Gruber.

Here are some links for additional background and information:

Beckett’s play, Krapp’s LastTape and a YouTubevideo of a performance from the play


Examples of Teipolo’s work and his frescoesin the Wurzburg Residenz (check out that staircase!)

Velasquez website with pictures of his artwork

An art critic’s review of the book

And, a youtube trailer for the book (because it’s not enough to just write a book anymore…)

 

Coming up, we have the following titles to look forward to reading:

 

November 8                LostKingdom: Hawaii’s Last Queen, the Sugar Kings and America’s First ImperialAdventure by Julia Flynn Siler –

The author, Julia Siler, will join us this evening to discuss her book and her research about Hawaii

December 13              The Sense of an Ending by Julian Barnes

 

Thanks for reading with us. I look forward to seeing you at the Fairfax Library.

Beth Bailey-Gates
Friends of the Fairfax Library
bethmbg@gmail.com

Thursday, May 3, 2012

Nothing to Envy: Ordinary Lives in North Korea - May 2012

May 2012 book selection

The Fairfax Library Book Discussion Group will meet Thursday, May  10th  at 7 p.m. in the meeting room of the Fairfax Library to discuss our May book: Nothing to Envy: Ordinary Lives in North Korea by Barbara Demick.

Here are some links for additional background and information:










Below are discussion questions.


Thanks for reading with us. I look forward to seeing you at the Fairfax Library.

Beth Bailey-Gates
Friends of the Fairfax Library


DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
Nothing to Envy by Barbara Demick

1. Demick follows the lives of six North Koreans. Whose story do you find most compelling, disturbing, horrific—or inspiring?

2. Talk about what happens to those who manage to defect. How do they manage life outside North Korea? What are the difficulties— both practical and psychological—they confront in their new lives?

3. Demick describes North Korea, not as an undeveloped country, but as "a country that has fallen out of the developed world." What does she mean? What would it be like for any of us to live under the conditions in North Korea? What would be most difficult for you? What shocked or angered you most about the book's descriptions of life in the DPRK?

4. Discuss the history of North Korea and its descent into deprivation. How did a formerly wealthy, industrialized country—which attracted Chinese from across the border—deteriorate into its present state?

5. What does it take to survive in North Korea? How do some get around the restrictive laws?

6. Do Koreans love their "dear leader" as much as they claim?

7. How does one explain the disparity between North and South Korea?

8. Talk about your experience reading this book? Was it hard to get through...or did you find yourself unable to put the book down? Were you depressed, angered, outraged, thankful for your own life...or all of the above?

9. If you have read 1984 by George Orwell, describe similarities between the countries of Oceania and North Korea? Similarities and differences between Kim Jong-il and Big Brother, the Thought Police and Ministry of Truth?